I can’t remember seeing James Bond wearing two timepieces but presumably he has too since being equipped with an Omega Seamaster. Encouraged as a fan of the films and in the market for a ‘watch for life’ type purchase I succumbed and invested most of my savings in a shiny new James Bond Seamaster Omega watch. I am not proud of being so easily swayed by the marketing people but as they say, I am what I am.
However, my suspicions about the Omega Seamaster’s timekeeping ability were first raised when I was popping champagne corks at a New Year’s even party nearly 5 minutes ahead of everyone else. That has its advantages of course, but was slightly concerning considering the size of my recent investment. I reset the watch and checked it regularly through January but it was gaining time at an alarming rate (would be funnier if it had an alarm) so I took it back to the shop.
The watch was sent back to Omega who kept it ‘extra long’ to make sure it worked perfectly, or at least that is how the 9 and not 6 week turnaround time was explained and I picked it back up in April. The watch continued to gain time and so I wrote to Omega and shared my disappointment and my concern that I didn’t know what to do next. Here is the letter they sent back:
As it happens, I haven’t been contacted in ‘short’ by Mr Mike Webb but no matter. I can’t see how any explanation that an Omega watch is ‘OK’ if it has a tolerance of -1 to +6 seconds is going to help me. However, if he does call I will suggest he gives James a ring. For him it could be the difference between life and death.